Lessons and Warnings from the Experiences of Ages Past: Education: Never, ever, will the Ignorant Person Be in a Position to . .

Lessons and Warnings from the Experiences of Ages Past: Education: Never, ever, will the Ignorant Person Be in a Position to . .

Never, ever, will the ignorant person be in a position to hold and pull his or her own strings.

Why do you all think that I'm so big on quality education and research and thinking accurately?

If you can't think of a good reason, I'll give you the main reason.

It's this: I love freedom and I cannot access freedom, I cannot be a person who exercises my God-given free will if I'm an ignoramus, an ignorant person.

Ignorant people are puppets on strings held and pulled by other people.


Why do I say this, make this claim?

"In following my friend Walter
Williams I would point out that that a
good definition of slavery is forcing a
person to work for the benefit of
another person.

That's a pretty good
definition of slavery; now the real
slaves were slaves for 12 months out of
the year but the Danes are slaves for
just 70 percent of the years.

So they're not quite as office real slaves they're their only slaves to other people for 70% of the
year instead of instead of 2030. " 1

1 "Ten Things Millennials Should Know About Socialism | Thomas J. Dilorenzo". 2018. Youtube. Accessed January 27 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZSq_zZ5VrQ.

5 Inequality Myths

Ten Things Millennials Should Know About Socialism | Thomas J. DiLorenzo

The Mises View: "Income Inequality" | Joseph T. Salerno

Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed

Williams With Sowell - Progressive Racism

Conservative Politics: Hillary Clinton Attributing to James Comey, Misogyny, and Wikleaks her Losing this Election - Proves that She just doesn’t Understand Why She Lost this Presidential Election – otherwise she doesn’t Admit that She Does

I just read the short article by Don Irving in Accuracy in Media’s website.  

“In an interview with New York magazine discussing her life after the election, Hillary Clinton said that the eagerness to pin her election loss solely on her is due to “schadenfreude.” ¹

 Do you Believe that Claim? 

Do you believe that she truly expects us who read that article to believe that she’s being serious when she says those bogus things?

If you take the Hillary Clinton rhetoric at face value, then I  question the thoroughness of your critical thinking skills. The actor Morgan Freeman very likely does not believe this and he admitted having voted for Hillary.

Hillary was a Poor Choice  of a Nominee for the Democratic Party

Even though she won more than two hundred electoral votes and overwhelmed Donald Trump in terms of popular votes, she was a poor choice of a nominee for the Democratic Party. 

Her Character, her Lack of Popularity, and her Confrontational, Abrasive Personality  those Attributes,  plus her strident speaking Style  didn't  Help

Her character was deemed too shady, too dishonest, and too rotted for her to have been allowed to succeed.   Her haughty, unlikeable personality compounded her bad political image. This article probes these aspects as to the matter of her losing that election.

She was never anywhere as popular as was Bill Clinton when he was a candidate. She lost because she was an overconfident, arrogant politician.  

She was a poor candidate because she simply lacked the character to be a national leader. Moreover, she lacks the personal qualities to inspire the voting mass to support her.  

Also, she’s not deemed trustworthy and she’s unlikeable.  And then there is her background. She did a poor job as Senator and she did a poorer job still as US Secretary of State during Obama’s first term in office.  

Her experience at work, particularly the Benghazi scandal and her email scandal exposed her failures.  She was not equipped to defeat Donald Trump in this last Presidential election.

She Failed to Take Responsibility for her Failures and Generalized Away the Causes of that Failure

As for the reasons she cited for her loss are concerned: James Comey’s letter, the Wikileaks leaks, and misogyny of the people against her are concerned – there are not enough misogynists among the voting American population to have denied her the Presidency.  

There are liberal misogynists. Moreover, it's her that most men dislike, not women.  Now, if all women were her or like her, then misogyny would be a more valid excuse. 

But then, the misogynists would be right to loathe her. The misogynists would have been well justified to oppose her from coming anywhere to acquiring any political power as the administrator of the national government.

As for the Comey letter,  the letter was not enough to bury her. And the Wikileaks also could not have undermined her run. 

In Conclusion then

As you can probably tell by now, she’s too proud and too arrogant to admit to herself and to others that she did an extremely poor job as the Presidential candidate.   The available space to provide a protracted discussion into this matter falls short.  Thus, this article’s purpose merely was to analyze and expose Hillary Clinton’s rationalization for having lost the election to Donald Trump.

¹ Hillary Clinton Says Eagerness to Pin Election Loss Solely On Her Is Due To "Schadenfreude". 2017. Accuracy in Media. Accessed July 8, 2017. http://www.aim.org/don-irvine-blog/hillary-clinton-says-eagerness-to-pin-election-loss-solely-on-her-is-due-to-schadenfreude/.